It’s often mentioned that breakthroughs can not be scheduled. I’m here to explain how this is twentieth century thinking. The statement assumes the word “breakthrough” is unambiguously defined. This web site post questions that assumption and offers a step-by-step help guide achieving a breakthrough. My focus is on batteries, but by incorporating tweaks, you can adapt this for other locations also.
Allow me to begin with saying that within the last century there seemed to be a feeling a breakthrough was believed to be when, for instance, you discover a new material for li ion battery that has, say, higher energy or is safer or something that is. Those kinds of breakthroughs then glance at the traditional rigmarole of publications, licensing, technology transfer, peer appreciation, awards, products and all of those other boring things which takes 2 decades to obtain settled. In age of Twitter, Facebook, Uber, and, Snapchat, these kinds of period of time is perfect for the folks unwilling to look to new means of achieving breakthroughs. Should you participate in this “old” club, Make sure you move ahead. This informative guide will probably be of no use to you.
But exactly what is a breakthrough anyway? So far as I realize there is absolutely no body that proclaims something a breakthrough (a Pope for science?). And is there really such a thing as being an eureka moment? Even though you have one, it will likely be per year before you can reproduce the experiment and have all of the methods of destination to prove it. And if the breakthrough is supposed to be considered a product, it may need you 10 more years to scale it and then make it.
But can you imagine if there were a respected publication which actually called something a breakthrough. Then this is validated and verified by other publications saying the same thing? That looks to be in line with the scientific method, does it not?
So, for the purpose of advancing, let us define a breakthrough as just that: It is actually proclaimed as a result by multiple publication. And to assist us move ahead, publications will be broadly considered a peer reviewed journal article, or even a newspaper, or even a blog, or even a tweet etc. i.e., given that the saying breakthrough and your work display on the net somewhere, you are golden. This article can help you arrive.
Step One: Before you begin the studies, do not look at the literature. The peer-reviewed literature is full of things that were tried before. When you read them carefully, then what you are actually doing is definitely not new. Keep this in mind mantra (courtesy of NBC when they were promoting reruns within the 90s): “If you haven’t seen it before, its a novice to you”.
Step 2: As you may start the studies, understand that facts just get in the manner. The literature is loaded with facts (hence Step 1). In 1492 everyone thought the planet was flat; until Columbus took for the seas.1 Then we all thought it was round, until Tom Friedman proved it was flat. Till The Matrix came out, we thought gravity was forever binding us for the earth. Breakthroughs happen when these laws are broken plus it has a bold person to look where no person has gone before. To paraphrase Marsellus Wallace from Pulp Fiction, you might feel a slight sting every once in a while when it seems like you will be violating faraday’s law. These are the facts f*ing along. f* facts.
Step Three: Now that you have done your due diligence and ignored everything, it can be time to focus. Try to work towards a newly-discovered material, or atleast one which has been forgotten for some time. It becomes an important step. As much as you may go after Steps 1 and 2, the better studied the information, the harder it is to prove to yourself you are violating each of the well known laws as you are charting a whole new path as an alternative to screwing up. It’s so much easier to imagine this if it’s a brand new material. Graphene is great (less a battery material, but remember Step 2). So are fullerenes (granted they may be old, but it appears as though its time to revisit them). Graphite, however, might be bad; if you do not intend to make use of it within a new way; whereby it could be good. Lithium metal is usually good; however, if you decide to go this route you should get religion on Steps 1 and two.
Step 4: While you start getting data around the new invention, revisit Step 2. Revisit many times, it, especially when you are feeling down.
Step 5: Time for you to start writing the paper. Always suggest that your invention is superior to Li-ion. The best way to get anyone excited is always to claim that. This can sound hard, yet it is not. There are several metrics that need to be satisfied for industrial battery, including, energy, power, charge time, cost, life, safety, low temperature and temperature stability. If you feel that you may have an issue that looks better in virtually any one of these brilliant, you are doing a lot better than Li-ion. Pricing is the 55dexhpky one if everything else fails. You could always safely say something like “our preliminary cost estimates advise that battery will definitely cost below something-small/kWh”. Opposite end in the spectrum is energy, the hardest. When you decline this path you actually need Step 6.
Step 6: Always confuse energy with power. It’s completely appropriate to state “Our pixie dust battery can discharge an aspect of 10 faster than Li-ion, therefore EVs based on pixie dust have got a longer driving range comparable to Li-ion EVs” or “our batteries can be charged in five minutes, providing more energy than any battery known to man or aliens. On the separate note, we just manage to purchase one cycle from your battery; we think this has something related to aliens”
Step 7: The paper is prepared and is particularly time for you to submit. Never send the paper into a journal that specializes in publishing papers in batteries. This will get the paper to the hands of traditional battery-types who remember past history, know what works and what does not, and also have a strong scientific foundation from the field. Such knowledge can be an impediment for your out-of-the-box thinking. Remember Step 2. Always pick a journal that is certainly disconnected through the battery field.
Step 8: With all the paper popping out, it is actually time to prepare for a press release. Remember that the press desires to hear that it is a breakthrough. So despite what the peer-reviewed paper proves, be sure to call it a breakthrough at the press release. Keep in mind that Steve Jobs did not really have a working iPhone as he announced it around the globe, and declared that they will ship in six months. Should it be suitable for Steve, I’m sure it is actually adequate for yourself. So don’t be shy in telling the press how great 18650 battery pack will probably be. Make certain you give interviews to numerous publications. Remember our meaning of a breakthrough: you require multiple publications to state it can be one. So target many outlets.
Step 9: The time has arrived; the publications are out; and you will have spend the better area of the day googling you to ultimately observe how far the saying has spread. Here is the day once you may hear skepticism (some contained within the articles among others in emails addressed to you). Remember Step 2. Remind yourself that the iPhone had many critics (e.g, the proximity sensor will not work. Who would want to surf the net with a phone anyway? Atleast they got the very first problem right!). When it determined for Steve Jobs, that could figure out for yourself too.